一套Itanium HP-UX上的9.2.0.5系统最近出现了ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kgskdecrstat1], [], [], [], [], [],内部错误,其错误日志如下:

Mon Apr 18 12:32:20 2011
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kgskdecrstat1], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
ARC0: Completed archiving  log 6 thread 1 sequence 831803
Mon Apr 18 12:32:22 2011
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kgskdecrstat1], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kgskdecrstat1], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Mon Apr 18 12:32:23 2011
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kgskdecrstat1], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kgskdecrstat1], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

Trace file
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
JServer Release - Production
ORACLE_HOME = /opt/oracle/product/
System name:	HP-UX
Release:	B.11.23
Version:	U
Machine:	ia64
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 28
Unix process pid: 14827, image: oracle@(TNS V1-V3)

*** 2011-04-18 02:39:15.043
*** SESSION ID:(276.16183) 2011-04-18 02:39:15.042
Current SQL statement for this session:
The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
information may aid in determining the deadlock:
Deadlock graph:
                      ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
TX-00030022-0070d56f        28     276     X            344     259           X
TX-000a0012-0058e4fc       344     259     X             28     276           X
session 276: DID 0001-001C-0000002C	session 259: DID 0001-0158-000020E6
session 259: DID 0001-0158-000020E6	session 276: DID 0001-001C-0000002C
Rows waited on:
Session 259: obj - rowid = 00001F0D - AABNCDAAEAAAAXYAAL
 (dictionary objn - 7949, file - 4, block - 1496, slot - 11)
Session 276: obj - rowid = 00001F0B - AABNCAAAEAAAAXCAAY
 (dictionary objn - 7947, file - 4, block - 1474, slot - 24)
Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
Session 259:
 pid=344 serial=17280 audsid=106170227 user: 41
           program: JDBC Thin Client
 application name: JDBC Thin Client, hash value=0
 Current SQL Statement:
End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.
*** 2011-04-18 12:32:20.392
ksedmp: internal or fatal error
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kgskdecrstat1], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
----- Call Stack Trace -----
... kgskdecrstat  kskdecrstat  ktudecrustat  ktcdso  ktcrcm  ktdcmt  k2lcom ...
----- End of Call Stack Trace -----

   program: JDBC Thin Client
   application name: JDBC Thin Client, hash value=0
   last wait for 'SQL*Net message from client' blocking sess=0x0 seq=39332 wait_time=21242
               driver id=74637000, #bytes=1, =0

可以看到以上引发ORA-00600[kgskdecrstat1]内部错误的进程同时发现了死锁(DEADLOCK),在MOS上搜索可以发现”Bug 2894072: ORA-00600: INTERNAL ERROR CODE, ARGUMENTS: [KGSKDECRSTAT1]”,但是该Bug最早发生在9.2.0.3上,已经确定影响9.2.0.x所有版本,并且在9.2.0.5上没有backport的bug fix。

提交sr后,Oracle Gcs给出了解决的solution:
2.解决引发该bug的ORA-00060 dead lock问题
3.如果在解决ORA-00060后仍出现以上ORA-00600[kgskdecrstat1]内部错误,且启用了9i早期版本中的resource manager的话,可以尝试禁用该特性:
ALTER SYSTEM SET resource_manager_plan=” SCOPE=BOTH;
以便绕过bug 2494790。


扫码关注 微信公众号:


  1. admin says:

    Hdr: 3090309 RDBMS TXN MGMT DIST PRODID-5 PORTID-453 2494790

    Fidelity continues to get the ORA-600 [kgskdecrstat1]
    Even after applying Bug Patch 2494790.

    Current SQL statement for this session:
    next_date DATE := :mydate;
    broken BOOLEAN := FALSE;
    declare rc binary_integer;
    begin rc := sys.dbms_defer_sys.push(destination=>’FSADB20.WORLD’,
    stop_on_error= >FALSE, execution_seconds=>5400,
    delay_seconds=>50, parallelism=>0); end;

    :mydate := next_date;
    IF broken THEN :b := 1; ELSE :b := 0;
    END IF;
    —– PL/SQL Call Stack —–
    If I change resource_limit=FALSE, there is no error occurring.
    However, we do use profiles for some usernames and want the
    resource_limit=TRUE and need a solution to this ora-600 bug.





    ksedmp()+248 CALL ksedst()+0
    kgerinv()+160 PTR_CALL 00000000
    kgeasnmierr()+28 CALL kgerinv()+0
    kgskdecrstat()+448 CALL kgeasnmierr()+0
    kskdecrstat()+500 CALL kgskdecrstat()+0
    ktudecrustat()+460 CALL kskdecrstat()+0
    ktcdso()+756 CALL ktudecrustat()+0
    ktcrcm()+2812 CALL ktcdso()+0
    ktdcmt()+132 CALL ktcrcm()+0
    k2lcom()+88 CALL ktdcmt()+0
    k2send()+1024 CALL k2lcom()+0
    xctctl()+96 CALL k2send()+0
    xctcom()+284 CALL xctctl()+0
    psdtcm()+216 CALL xctcom()+0
    pevm_icd_call_commo PTR_CALL 00000000
    pfrrun()+7420 CALL pevm_icd_call_commo
    peicnt()+216 CALL pfrrun()+0
    kkxexe()+524 CALL peicnt()+0
    opiexe()+11508 CALL kkxexe()+0
    opiodr()+2488 PTR_CALL 00000000
    rpidrus()+112 CALL opiodr()+0
    skgmstack()+152 PTR_CALL 00000000
    rpidru()+124 CALL skgmstack()+0
    rpiswu2()+328 PTR_CALL 00000000
    rpidrv()+2428 CALL rpiswu2()+0
    rpiexe()+32 CALL rpidrv()+0
    kkjex1e()+4052 CALL rpiexe()+0
    kkjsexe()+240 CALL kkjex1e()+0
    kkjrdp()+804 CALL kkjsexe()+0
    opirip()+992 CALL kkjrdp()+0
    opidrv()+684 CALL opirip()+0
    sou2o()+16 CALL opidrv()+0
    main()+160 CALL sou2o()+0
    _start()+264 CALL main()+0

    The scenario is not a problem when I stop and start the resource_manager_plan
    repeatedly in a short period of time. The scenario is when then plan is
    active, and oracle advanced replication transactions are pushed, than the
    ORA-600 error occurs each time.



    Currently in the certification stage … Going into Production within the next
    1-2 weeks. Fidelity needs to resolve this issue before going to prod.

    Question from Client regarding _job_queue_interval …
    I am taking your direction and applying the patch, 2494790 on the solaris
    2.8 machine and bouncing the icmq1 database at 4pm est today.
    My question, is the change to job_queue_interval from 60 to 2000. The issue
    to me is that we use job_queue_interval for 60 now w/ advanced replication
    and have a VERY high flow of transactions per minute, and my understanding is
    that the job_queue_interval wakes up and looks for work every 60 seconds.
    Changing this to 2000 means our schedule_push would be pushing every 33
    minutes, instead of every one minute. This would be unacceptable if this
    assumption is correct. Please advise.

    From Fidelity :
    We have successfully installed the patch 2494790 and bounced the icmq1
    database. I have restarted the database resource manager and did schedule
    push of oracle replicated transactions and reproduced the ORA-600 errors.
    I will upload the alert log and the latest .trc file for your review.
    Also, the job_queue_interval init.ora parameter is not a normal parameter
    available in for me to modify.
    I did inform them this is an “underscore” parameter, but based on your latest
    update, IN will upload the latest trace and alert files, and wait further

    Here is the process that Fidelity uses to create the plan and start
    the resourse manager…. There is additional info as well.

    Procedure from Fidelity:
    The commands to start and stop the resource manager are…
    (run as my dba account…)
    exec dbms_resource_manager.switch_plan(”);
    exec dbms_resource_manager.switch_plan(‘WEEKLY_SYNCHRO_PLAN’);

    Here’s my procedure to install the database resource manager via
    the oracle enterprise manager gui…
    1. (assumes database was migrated from to
    2. existing resource manager plan, called WEEKLY_SYNCHRO_PLAN deleted via oem
    3. use create option (not create wizard) for resource plan and create a
    new plan called WEEKLY_SYNCHRO_PLAN via om
    4. create new resource groups for DBA_GROUP, REPORTING_GROUP, SYNCHRO_GROUP.
    5. assign users to default groups and assign 90% to 5 different levels
    for 5 different resource groups.
    6. apply parallelism limitations for each group
    7. turn on the plan..
    exec dbms_resource_manager.switch_plan(`WEEKLY_SYNCHRO_PLAN?);
    8. run a transaction on a table that is set up in real-time replication and
    ensure transaction is pushed via schedule_push from this database.
    9. observe alert log to see if ORA-600 occurred.

    Additional Info from Fidelity:
    I think I need to clarify that the database resource plan is normally not
    running in production except for once/week from wed 8pm to thursday about
    10am. So when the 8i to 9i database upgrade is done, the resource manager is
    definitely not running. I delete the resource plan while it is not active.

    Just tested by shutting off the plan and turning it on 5 minutes later, then
    pushing a replicated transaction, but did NOT cause an ORA-600 to occur.
    So I cannot prove that this alone causes the error. I had also reported
    that I had run a large periodic update producing thousands of replicated
    transactions for a few hours and no additional ORA-600 was produced during
    this time period.
    Latest info from Fidelity:
    1) true, problem only exists when resource_limit=TRUE
    this init.ora parameter setting is a requiremnt for us to go live.

    2) I did not specify an undo limit for the resource manager.
    We are using the “old” rollback segments for this live install on
    12-SEP-2003 and are NOT utilizing the new undo management feature
    for this release due to reports that it was “buggy” in the first
    release of oracle 9i.
    Since we are not utilizing the undo mgt feature, what exactly do
    you want me to try a workaround with?

    Also, I could not find info on the 10720 trace event.
    but since it undoes the undo mgt feature and we are not utilizing this
    feature, is this still an issue? .

    The current definition for the undo_pool feature within database
    resource manager looks like this…

    all 5 resource groups show the undo_pool entry as UNLIMITED.
    The only info that I could find about event 10720 is what you have already
    indicated and the little info in not 76237.1 “traces db scheduling”.

    Fidelity has set the event 10720 in the system … Here is the outcome …
    So far so good, event added to init.ora, icmq1 database bounced,
    I have turned the database resource manager plan on and off several times in
    row and pushed orep transactions and have so far,
    not resulted in any alert log error and no ORA-600 errors.
    I’ll continue to test.

    Now, the patch that was applied to this database, 2494790, is this still
    required or should it be backed out? if it should be backed out, how
    is this done?
    Can you provide feedback on the 2494790 patch?

  2. admin says:

    Bug 2494790 Undo quota discrepancies may be reported for global transactions

    This note gives a brief overview of bug 2494790.
    The content was last updated on: 29-MAR-2004
    Click here for details of each of the sections below.

    Product (Component) Oracle Server (Rdbms)
    Range of versions believed to be affected Versions >= 9.0 but < Versions confirmed as being affected Platforms affected Generic (all / most platforms affected) Fixed: This issue is fixed in iAS Patch Set (Server Patch Set) (Base Release) Symptoms: Related To: (None Specified) XA / Distributed Transactions Description When the resource manager is enabled, global transactions can cause undo quota discrepancy messages in the alert log. eg: KTUDECRUSTAT: undo quota discrepancy: xcb=0, xcbusz=52, ResMgr=0 Workaround: These messages can be ignored as they are not a serious problem.

  3. admin says:

    Type B – Defect Fixed in Product Version –
    Severity 2 – Severe Loss of Service Product Version
    Status 36 – Duplicate Bug. To Filer Platform 23 – Oracle Solaris on SPARC (64-bit)
    Created 08-Apr-2003 Platform Version 5.8
    Updated 26-Nov-2003 Base Bug 2494790
    Database Version
    Affects Platforms Generic
    Product Source Oracle Affected Version –
    Related Products
    Line Oracle Database Products Family Oracle Database
    Area Oracle Database Product 5 – Oracle Server – Enterprise Edition
    Hdr: 2894072 RDBMS TXN MGMT LOCAL PRODID-5 PORTID-23 ORA-600 2494790

    Customer is getting ORA-600: internal error code, arguments: [kgskdecrstat1]



    Bug:1533623> BugDB see Bug:1533623.-P No Base Bug
    Related Bugs : DDR:
    Customer: INTERNAL Created: 07-DEC-00
    Component: RDBMS Comp Ver: 9.0.0 Rel St: A Updated: 05-JUL-01
    Sub Comp: RDBMS Ver: 9.0.0 By: ARHEE
    Status: 91,Closed, Could Not Reproduce
    Sup Pri: 2,Severe Loss of Service Fixed In Ver:
    O/S: 453 Sun SPARC Solaris
    PL Group: UNIX Gen/Port: G Error #: – Pub: N


    Hdr: 1533623 9.0.0 RDBMS 9.0.0 PRODID-5 PORTID-453
    Abstract: ORA-600 [KGSKDECRSTAT1], [], [], [], [], [] ON SWITCH CONSUMER


    N/A one time error

    ORA-600: internal error code, arguments: [kgskdecrstat1], [], [], [], [],
    [], [], []
    —– Call Stack Trace —–
    calling call entry argument values in hex

    location type point (? means dubious value)

    ——————– ——– ——————–
    ksedmp kgerinv kgeasnmierr kgskdecrstat kskdecrstat ktudecrustat ktcdso ktcrcm
    ktdcmt k2lcom k2send xctctl xctcom opiodr ttcpip opitsk opiino opiodr opidrv
    sou2o main _start

    Will upload related files.

Speak Your Mind

TEL/電話+86 13764045638
QQ 47079569